Imaging of patients and their publication in the media is one of the emerging challenges at the intersection of the health system, media law, and Islamic jurisprudence. With the spread of digital tools and the ease of imaging and content distribution, the need to review the Sharia and legal regulations related to patient privacy has become more urgent. This study, with the aim of analyzing the jurisprudence and legal aspects of publishing patient images, focuses on variables such as the location and time of imaging, type of tool, purpose of publication, and patient consent. Using qualitative and inferential content analysis methods, data were collected and analyzed from legal sources such as the Islamic Penal Code, the Computer Crimes Act, the Patient Rights Charter, and jurisprudential texts including the Quran, hadiths, and jurisprudential rules. The findings show that from a legal perspective, imaging of patients in private places of medical centers and publishing it in mass media without valid consent is criminalized and requires registration and documentation in emergency situations. From a jurisprudential perspective, rules such as the sanctity of surveillance, the rule of dominance, non-harm, and beneficence prohibit imaging and its publication without the patient's consent, except in emergency cases. Ultimately, the research suggests a conceptual and indigenous framework that can serve as the basis for developing a transparent national guideline, including the requirement to obtain informed consent, limiting purposes to treatment and education, controlling imaging tools, and carefully distinguishing permitted locations and times. This framework will help improve the quality of health services, protect patients' rights, and increase public trust in the health system