Refah University College

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

---

Abstract The issue that can be propounded about receiving satellite networks at home is that if we accept that in juridical reasoning, its content is the same with using satellite channels, is the way of legislation and also type of government’s interference in this field is acceptable juridical viewpoint? In other words, can it be expressed that unlawfulness is a reason for being prohibited? How much does government interfere in policy-making and legislation? What are discrepancy and conflict of juridical and influential titles in policy-making? In policy-making literature, government plays an axial role; hence, to answer this question, first, we should determine its position in religious viewpoint. Therefore, researcher has tried to determine main duties of government is a classification through studying Quran verses and related narratives. Next, issue of satellite networks (channels) was considered under juridical titles of system disturbance, keeping Islamic system and culpability of social abnormalities. Obtained results after considering scholars’ opinion based on four resources of consensus (Ijma), reason (intellect), book and tradition was that based on titles of common tools, indeterminacy of private and public sphere, unpredictability of Negation of Domination” (Nafy-e- Sabil), dependence of satellite networks variable and no attention to other components, non-negativity of any disturbance in system, audiences’ suspicion and doubt about punishment for using satellite networks, brings the result toward multi-layering policy-making from juridical aspect.

Keywords: Key words: policy making, jurisprudence, satellite networks, system disturbance, culpability of abnormalities, keeping Islamic system

Full-Text [PDF 632 kb]   (1191 Downloads)    

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

---

---